JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 8, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Jose Miguel Arango Isaza·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Atenta contra la cosa juzgada y contraría la seguridad jurídica
  • Rechazar por cuanto busca nuevo pronunciamiento
Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración, corrección o adición
Procedencia Excepcional De La Aclaracion
  • Supeditada a que exista una razón objetiva de duda que impida el entendimiento de la providencia
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Aclaración de la Sentencia T-084/12.

El memorialista solicitó la aclaración del numeral segundo de la sentencia de la referencia, en el sentido de indicar en forma precisa a quienes se extienden los beneficios a los que se refiere la sentencia, teniendo en cuenta que existen otros fallos proferidos en procesos de tutela originados en demandas idénticas, con resultados adversos a los trabajadores, que no fueron revisados por la Corte.

Por encontrar improcedente la solicitud de aclaración impetrad, la Sala decide RECHAZARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-084 de 2012.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.